Gabby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:24:51 pm
Alec wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:20:39 pm
Meh, like I haven't written anyone off, but I don't see the whole "he was more active" thing as much of a decision maker either, the final 5 mishap sucked but otherwise it's not too big of a deal to me personally
I feel like you’ve been given everything you asked for from/for Sebastian, you just don’t want to vote for him. That’s fine. I just said he did so much more, not that he was just more active, but you want to read it as me saying he was more active. I’m not trying to fight you I’m just asking again what you need to help you decide.
Not sure how you came to that conclusion, he answered all of my questions, yeah. To say he gave me everything I asked for is false though, considering I wanted to guy to take ownership for his actions rather than continue to shill this "I'm so sorry I hurt everyone's feelings!" narrative he's been pushing. I'd be locked in if he just came forward and said yeah, I cared about about winning than personal relationships, but all he's been trying to do is redeem his character. Which is fine, but it feels paper thin.
I'm still on the fence even after all of my instincts tell me not to vote for him because I still see a lot of good points about his game in here - even if he won't own up to them. I guess the reason I'm on the fence is that he seems more interested in pandering to the people he perceives he hurt instead of just taking ownership of the moves he made unapologetically. This sudden change of attitude conflicts with the cocky, give-no-fucks persona he put on at every tribal council, and to me it's a bit of a cop out.
You also said " I don't want someone who spent not even half the time I spent on here to get the W." which is what I was basing my assumption that a big part of your vote is how active someone was which is totally valid.
